Usage of shape memory implants in the formation of interstitial anastomoses in the experiment
https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/81/04
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to study in an experiment the advantages of creating interintestinal anastomoses using a construction with thermomechanical memory made of titanium nickelide in comparison with the classical method of imposing interintestinal anastomoses. The work was carried out on mongrel dogs by the method of performing compression and ligature interintestinal anastomoses. The tissue response in the area of interintestinal anastomosis was studied by the authors and confirmed by histological studies. In the studied tissues of the compression interintestinal anastomosis, microscopically, the indicators of the reactive inflammatory process were less pronounced and, ultimately, no dystrophic changes and tissue nutritional disorders were found in the test material. The healing of the intestinal mucosa was significantly better than in the classical ligature anastomosis. On the basis of the experimental data obtained by us, it was concluded that the use of compression interintestinal anastomoses for the purpose of creating anastomoses occurs with the best conditions for wound healing at the site of imposition of the performed anastomosis, in contrast to the classical ligature anastomosis.
About the Authors
V. P. Saganov
Buryat State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav P. Saganov, Dr. Med. sci., Associate Professor, the Department of Hospital Surgery, Medical Institute
36a, Oktyabrskaya st., Ulan-Ude, 670002, Russia
V. Ye. Khitrikheev
Buryat State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir Ye. Khitrikheev, Dr. Med. sci., Professor, head of the Department of Hospital Surgery, Medical Institute
36a, Oktyabrskaya st., Ulan-Ude, 670002, Russia
References
1. Fedorov V.D., Vorobyev G.I, Rivkin V.L. Klinicheskaya operativnaya koloproktologiya: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Clinical operative proctology: A Guide for Physicians]. Moscow, 1994. 432 р. (In Russ.).
2. Gulov M.K. Profilaktika nesostoyatel’nosti shvov kul’ti 12 p.k. posle rezekcii zheludka [Preventing insolvency seams stump duodenum after gastric resection]. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya – Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2005;2:56-58 (In Russ.).
3. Yegiyev V.N. Odnoryadnyy nepreryvnyy shov anastomozov v abdominal’noy hirurgii [Single row continuous suture anastomosis in abdominal surgery]. Moscow, Medpraktika-M Publ., 2002. 98 p. (In Russ.).
4. Waage A., Gagner M., Biertho L. et al. Comparison between open hand-sewn, laparoscopic stapled and laparoscopic computer-mediated, circular stapled gastro-jejunostomies in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the porcine model. Obes Surg. 2005;15: 782–787.
5. Protopopova A.I. Osobennosti vosstanovleniya motorno-evakuatornoy funkcii zheludochno-kishechnogo trakta v zavisimosti ot metoda nalozheniya mezhkishechnyh anastomozov: dis. kand. med. nauk [Peculiarities of restoration of motor-evacuator function of the gastrointestinal tract depending on the method of imposing intercusive anastomoses]. Yakutsk, 2010. 142 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kecherukov A.I. Sravnitel’naya ocenka ligaturnogo i kompressionnogo anastomozov tolstoy kishki [Comparative evaluation of ligature and compression anastomosis of the large intestine]. Prakticheskaya proktologiya. Stat’i i publikacii [Practical Proctology. Articles and publications. 2008]. URL: http: // www.Proctolog.ru/articles/articles_01_32.htm (date of circulation: 04.22.2017) (In Russ.).
7. Dambayev G.Ts., Guenther V.E., Soloviev M.M. et al. Implantaty iz nikelida titana v abdominal’noy hirurgii [Implants from titanium nickelide in abdominal surgery]. Byulleten’ sibirskoy meditsiny – Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2007;6(3):71-75 (In Russ.).
8. Dambayev G.Ts., Gunther V.E., Soloviev M.M. et al. Implantaty s pamyat’yu formy v hirurgii. Atlas [Shape memory implants in surgery. Atlas]. Tomsk, MITS Publ., 2009. 70 p. (In Russ.).
9. Shilin V.M., Perkin E.M., Shilin M.V. O perspektivah kompressionnyh mezhkishechnyh anastomozov [On the prospects of compression inter-intestinal anastomoses]. Meditsina v Kuzbasse – Medicine in Kuzbass. 2006;2:13-15 (In Russ.).
10. Galimov O.V., Gilmanov A.Zh., Khanov O.V. et al. Profilaktika nesostoyatel’nosti anastomozov polykh organov zheludochno-kishechnogo trakta [Prevention of the inconsistency of anastomosis of the hollow organs of the gastrointestinal tract]. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova – N.I. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2008;10:27-29 (In Russ.).
11. Chen C. The art of bowel anastomosis. Scandinavian J Surg. 2012;101:238-240.
12. Shalimov S.A., Radzinsky P.A. Rukovodstvo po eksperimental’noy hirurgii [Guide to experimental surgery]. Moscow, Medicine Publ., 2009. 270 p. (In Russ.).
13. Agaev E.K. Nesostoyatel’nost’ shvov kishechnyh anastomozov u bol’nyh posle ekstrennoy i neotlozhnoy rezekcii kishki [The intestinal anastomotic insufficiency after the emergency gut resection]. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova – N.I. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2012;1:34-37 (In Russ.).
14. Zaitsev Ye.Yu. Mezhkishechnyye otsrochennyye kompressionnyye anastomozy, sformirovannyye ustroystvami iz nikelida titana pri neotlozhnoy rezektsii kishki: dis. dokt. med. nauk [Intestinal delayed compression anastomoses formed by devices made of titanium nickelide in an emergency resection of the intestine. Diss. Dr. Med. sci.]. Tyumen, 2009. 291 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Saganov V.P., Khitrikheev V.Ye. Usage of shape memory implants in the formation of interstitial anastomoses in the experiment. Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2022;25(2):38-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/81/04
Views:
631
Email this article 