State of the problem of artificial sphincter formation during colostomy (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/83/10
Abstract
Based on the analysis of domestic and foreign literature in the context of comparative effectiveness, the characteristics of the methods for creating an artificial sphincter during colostomy are presented. Various methods of colostomy formation are highlighted. Currently more than 200 methods and modifications of colostomy are known each of which has advantages and disadvantages and therefore cannot be considered ideal. In addition, there is the problem of maintenance of the colostomy associated with the constant functioning of the intestine and accordingly the release of contents. Therefore the search for a solution to the issue of preventing complications of terminal colostomy and improving the technique of forming an artificial anus is a very urgent and far from solved problem of operative coloproctology.
About the Authors
V. I. Korobeynikova
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valeria I. Korobeynikova– postgraduate student, the Department of Hospital Surgery with a Course of Cardiovascular Surgery.
2, Moskovskiy tract st., 634050, Tomsk
G. Ts. Dambaev
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgiy Ts. Dambaev – Honored Worker of Science of Russia, Dr. Med. sci., Professor, Corresponding member of RAS, head of the Department of Hospital Surgery with a Course of Cardiovascular Surgery.
2, Moskovskiy tract st., 634050, Tomsk
E. A. Avdoshina
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena A. Avdoshina – Cand. Med. sci., Assistant Professor, the Department of Hospital Surgery with a Course of Cardiovascular Surgery.
2, Moskovskiy tract st., 634050, Tomsk
References
1. Garmanova T.N., Kazachenko Ye.A, Krylov N.N. Iz istorii hirurgii: evolyutsiya vzglyadov na formirovaniye kishechnoy stomy [From the history of surgery: the evolution of views on the formation of intestinal stoma]. Istoriya meditsiny – History of Medicine. 2019;6(2):151-159 (in Russ.).
2. Chernyavsky A.M. Sposob nalozheniya kolostomy s formirovaniyem zamykatel’nogo apparata iz seroznomyshechnogo sloya stenki kishki: Avtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk [The method of imposing a colostomy with the formation of the closing apparatus from the serous-muscular layer of the intestinal wall: Author. Dis. Cand. Med. sci.]. Tomsk, 1987. 20 p. (in Russ.).
3. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Petrova G.V. Zlokachestvennyye novoobrazovaniya Rossii v 2020 godu (zabolevayemost’ i smertnost’) [Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality)]. Moscow, 2021. 252 p. (in Russ.).
4. Aliyev S.A., Aliyev E.S. Usovershenstvovaniye sposobov formirovaniya koncevoy kolostomy – real’nyy put’ k profilaktike parakolostomicheskih oslozhneniy [Improving the ways of forming the terminal colostomy – a real way to prevent paracolostomy complications]. Vestnik khirurgii im. I.I. Grekova – I.I. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2015;174(4):117-122 (in Russ.).
5. Andreyev A.V., Chekanov M.N. Otdalennye funktsional’nye rezul’taty rektal’nyh rezecsiy [Long-term functional results of rectal resections]. In: Sb. materialov 2-y Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii “Rossiyskaya Shkola kolorektal'noy hirurgii” [Materials of the 2nd International Conference “Russian School of Colorectal Surgery”]. Moscow, 2009. P. 59 (in Russ.).
6. Kozlov S.V., Meshkov A.V., Krivoshchekov Ye.P. Sposoby formirovaniya odnostvol’noy kolostomy pri hirurgicheskom lechenii kolorektal’nogo raka [Methods for the formation of a single-barrel colostomy in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer]. In: Sb. materialov Yezhegodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Novye tehnologii v onkologii” [Materials of the Annual scientific-practical conference “New technologies in oncology”]. Samara, 2011. P. 99 (in Russ.).
7. Fedorin A.I. Osobennosti formirovaniya kishechnyh svishchey s lechebnoy tsel’yu (obzor sostoyaniya problemy) [Peculiarities of intestinal stomas formation with curative intent (the problem state survey)]. Aspirantskiy vestnik Povolzh’ya – Postgraduate Bulletin of the Volga Region. 2011;1-2:173-176 (in Russ.).
8. Zherlov G.K., Bashirov S.R., Krasnoperov A.V. Sposob formirovaniya kolostomy: Patent No. 2175527 S1 Rossiyskaya Federatsiya, MPK A61V 17/00.; No.2000123454/14; zayavl. 11.09.2000; opubl. 10.11.2001; zayavitel’ Sibirskiy gosudarstvennyy meditsinskiy universitet [The method of forming a colostomy: Patent No. 2175527 C1 Russian Federation, IPC A61V 17/00. No. 2000123454/14: Appl. 09/11/2000: publ. 11.10/2001.: Applicant Siberian State Medical University] (in Russ.).
9. Zherlov G.K., Bashirov S.R. Rezervuarnye i sfinkteromodeliruyushchiye tekhnologii v hirurgii raka pryamoy kishki [Reservoir and sphincter-modeling technologies in rectal cancer surgery]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2008. 184 p. (in Russ.).
10. Meshkov A.V. Sfinkteromodeliruyushchiye metodiki pri formirovanii odnostvol'noy kolostomy [Sphinctermodeling techniques in the formation of a single-barrel colostomy]. Aspirantskiy vestnik Povolzh'ya – Postgraduate Bulletin of the Volga Region. 2015;1-2:126-130.
11. Rubin G.P., Hungin A.P., Kelly P.J., Ling J. Inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology and management in an English general practice population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:1553-9.
12. Sprangers M.A., Taal B.G., Aaronson N.K., te Velde A. Quality of life in colorectal cancer: stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:361-9.
13. Nugent K.P., Daniels P., Stewart B., Patankar R., Johnson C.D. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1569-74.
14. Roberts D.J. The pursuit of colostomy continence. J Wound Os-tomy Continence Nurs. 1997;24:92-97.
15. Reboa G., Frascio M., Zanolla R., Pitto G., Riboli E.B. Biofeedback training to obtain continence in permanent colostomy: experience of two centers. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:419-421.
16. Clague M.B., Heald R.J. Achievement of stomal continence in one-third of colostomies by use of a new disposable plug. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170:390-394.
17. Codina Cazador A., Piňol M., Marti Rague J., et al. Multicentre study of a continent colostomy plug. Br J Surg. 1993;80:930-932.
18. Konsten J., Baeten C.G., van Mameren H., Havenith M.G., Soeters P.B. Feasibility of stoma continence, using electrically stimulated rectus abdominis muscle in pigs. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:247-253.
19. Russold M.F., Ramnarine I., Ashley M., et al. Practical and Effective Stomal Sphincter Creation: Evaluation in Pigs. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2010;53(4):467-474. doi:10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181bdbe91
20. Nadko G. Velitchkov, Gueno K. Kirov, Julian E. Losanoff, et al. Abdominoperineal resection and perineal colostomy for low rectal cancer. 1997;40(5):530-533. doi:10.1007/bf02055373
Review
For citations:
Korobeynikova V.I., Dambaev G.Ts., Avdoshina E.A. State of the problem of artificial sphincter formation during colostomy (literature review). Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2022;25(4):92-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/83/10
Views:
242
Email this article 