Preview

Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of pretarsal and sub-brow blepharoplasty for correction of age-related upper eyelid changes in Asian race patients

https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/92/07

Abstract

The purpose of a study was to compare the blepharoplasty methods of pretarsal (Asian eyelid blepharoplasty) and sub-brow approaches in patients of the Asian ethnic group based on the analysis the surgical correction results of age-related upper eyelids changes.

Material and methods. The prospective clinical study included 133 mongoloid race people aged 45 to 71 years in the period up 2019 to 2024. The study participants were randomly divided into two groups. The 1st group (72 people) underwent age-related Asian blepharoplasty using a pretarsal approach, the 2nd group (61 people) underwent blepharoplasty using a sub-brow approach. The validated FACE-Q Satisfaction with Eyes questionnaire was used to assess the treatment results before, 3 and 6 months after blepharoplasty.

Results. Comparison of preoperative groups with blepharoplasty did not reveal statistically significant differences in satisfaction with eye appearance (p = 0.089). After blepharoplasty, we were unable to find differences between the study groups when assessing the degree of satisfaction with the appearance of the eyes after 3 months (92 (92–100) in patients of the 1st group and 92 (92–100) in patients of the 2nd group, p = 0.192). The score 6 months after blepharoplasty was statistically significantly higher in patients of 2nd group than in study participants from 1st group 100 (92–100), 96 (92–100) points, respectively, p = 0.027).

No complications such as postoperative brow ptosis or recurrence of lateral blepharochalasis were observed performing blepharoplasty using a sub-brow approach (group 2). This fact indicates that the risk of these complications is minimized.

Conclusion. Blepharoplasty using a sub-brow approach is a promising method of surgical correction of agerelated upper eyelids changes in patients of the Asian ethnic group, showing comparable effectiveness in comparison with age-related blepharoplasty of Asian eyelids. Using myo-periosteal fixation, this technique gives fewer complications in the form of postoperative brow ptosis.

About the Authors

N. E. Manturova
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Natalya E. Manturova, Dr. Med. sci., Professor, head of the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cosmetology and Cell Technologies; Chief freelance plastic surgeon of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

bld. 6, 1, Ostrovityanov st., Moscow, 117513



V. I. Sharobaro
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Valentin I. Sharobaro, Dr. Med. sci., Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Plastic Surgery Clinic, head of the Department of Plastic Surgery

8, bld. 2, Trubetskaya st., Moscow, 119991



H. Le
Pham Ngoc Thach Medical University
Viet Nam

Le Hanh, PhD, Professor, head of the Department of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery; President of the Vietnamese Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (VSAPS)

Bldg. 20, Hong Bang st., Area 12, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, 748000



T. S. Nguyen
108 Military Central Hospital
Viet Nam

Nguyen Tai Son, PhD, Professor, Professor of the Department of Maxillofacial and Reconstructive Surgery; Vice-President of the Vietnam Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (VSAPS)

1, Tran Hung Dao st., Hai Ba Trung district, Hanoi, 113720



D. B. Nguyen
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Nguyen Dinh Bao, plastic surgeon, postgraduate student, the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cosmetology and Cell Technologies

bld. 6, 1, Ostrovityanov st., Moscow, 117513



M. V. Anurov
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Mikhail V. Anurov, Dr. Med. sci., Professor, the Department of Biomedical Research Organization, Leading researcher at the Department of Experimental Surgery

bld. 6, 1, Ostrovityanov st., Moscow, 117513



H. N. Nguyen
University of Medicine and Pharmacy – Vietnam National University
Viet Nam

Nguyen Hong Nhung, PhD, plastic surgeon, Maxillofacial surgeon, the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, the E Hospital Vietnam; Lecturer

144, Suan Thuy st., Dich Vong Hau, Cau Giay district, Hanoi, 123105



A. Yu. Ustyugov
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Andrey Yu. Ustyugov, Cand. Med. sci., Associate Professor, the Department of Oncology, Hematology and Radiation Therapy

bld. 6, 1, Ostrovityanov st., Moscow, 117513 



References

1. ISAPS International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2020. 2021; https://www.isaps.org/discover/about-isaps/global-statistics/reports-and-press-releases/global-survey-2020-full-report-and-press-releases-english/

2. All-Russian Population Census 2020. (In Russ.). https://rosstat.gov.ru/vpn/2020

3. Kononets O.A., Nerobeev A.I., Malakhovskaya V.I. Analysis of some aspects of blepharoplasty with oriental eye shape. Actual problems of dentistry, Moscow. 2000;2:128–130. (In Russ).

4. Codner M.A., Kikkawa D.O., Korn B.S., Pacella S.J. Blepharoplasty and Brow Lift. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010;126:1e-17e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181dbc4a2

5. Kachkinbaev I.K., Alybaev M.E., Nguyen D.B. Clinical and anatomical classification of Asian eyelids by sagittal slice and its role in the choice of upper eyelid surgery. Plasticheskaya khirurgicheskaya i esteticheskaya meditsina – Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2021; 4: 29-37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202104129

6. Hacker H.D., Hollsten D.A. Investigation of automated perimetry in the evaluation of patients for upper lid blepharoplasty. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8(4):250-5. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199212000-00003

7. Ulas B., Ozcan A., Yar K., Kaya I., Binokay H. Evaluation of visual field and ocular surface parameters by clinical comparison after blepharoplasty for dermatochalasis. Journal Français Ophtalmologie. 2024 Apr;47(4):104135. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104135

8. Manturova NE, Sharobaro VI, Nikolenko VN, Nguyen DB, Zharikova TS, Kachkinbaev IK, Viet Hai Le. Anatomical features and agerelated changes of the upper eyelids in representatives of Asian peoples. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024; 4: 65-76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202404165

9. Bang Y.H. The double-eyelid operation without supratarsal fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 88: 12-17.

10. Branham G., Holds J.B. Brow/Upper lid anatomy, aging and aesthetic analysis. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 2015; 23(2): 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2015.01.001

11. Kim Y.S., Subbrow blepharoplasty using supraorbital rim periosteal fixation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014; 38: 27- 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0189-y

12. Kim H.S., Kim K.L. Subbrow lift using frontalis sling to correct lateral orbital laxity. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020; 44(6): 2119-2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01879-9

13. Wang J., Su Y., Zhang J., Guo P. A Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Subbrow Blepharoplasty and Subbrow Blepharoplasty Combined with Periorbital Muscle Manipulation for Periorbital Aging Rejuvenation in Asians. Aesth Plast Surg, 2020 Jun; 44(3): 788-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01630-4

14. Gunter J.P., Antrobus S.D. Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99: 1808-16.

15. Von Soest T., Kvalem I.L., Roald H.E., Skolleborg K.C. The effects of cosmetic surgery on body image, selfesteem, and psychological problems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 1238-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.12.093

16. Klassen A.F., Cano S.J., Schwitzer J.A., Scott A.M. Pusic A.L. FACE-Q Scales for Health-Related Quality of Life, Early Life Impact, Satisfaction with Outcomes, and Decision to Have Treatment: Development and Validation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015; 135, 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000895

17. Kalashnikova N.G., Kochetova T.F., Pakhomova R.A. Early laser treatment of local complications after surgical blepharoplasty. Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2022;25(4):29-37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/83/03

18. Silva K.R.S., Rossi D.C., Petroianu A. A New Classification of the Lateral Dermatochalasis of Upper Eyelids; Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jul;9(7):e3711. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003711

19. Yuzuriha S., Matsuo K., Kushima H. An anatomical structure which results in puffiness of the upper eyelid and a narrow palpebral fissure in the Mongoloid eye. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:466-72. doi: 10.1054/bjps.2000.3387

20. Kim J.H., Lee I.J., Park M.C., et al. Aesthetic blepharoptosis correction with release of fibrous web bands between the levator aponeurosis and orbital fat. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:e52. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182418d1a

21. Starck W.J., Griffin J.E. Jr, Epker BN. Objective evaluation of the eyelids and eyebrows after blepharoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54:297-302.

22. Alghoul M. Blepharoplasty: anatomy, planning, techniques, and safety. Aesthet Surg Journal. 2019; 39(1):10-28. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy034

23. ISAPS International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2022. 2023 https://www.isaps.org/discover/about-isaps/global-statistics/reports-and-press-releases/global-survey-2022-full-report-and-press-releases/

24. Chen B., Song H., Gao Q., Xu M., Wang J., Wang F., Chen S., Wu J., Li H. Measuring satisfaction with appearance: Validation of the FACE-Q scales for double-eyelid blepharoplasty with minor incision in young Asians- retrospective study of 200 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Aug;70(8):1129-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.028

25. Park J., Koh Ch. Asian upper blepharoplasty. Journal of Cosmetic Medicine. 2017;1:69-79. doi: 10.25056/JCM.2017.1.2.69

26. Told R., Placheta-Györi E., Lackner B., Kuchar A., Brugger J., Schmidt-Erfurth U., Dunavölgyi R. FACE-Q Patient Report-Assisted Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Blepharoplasty Outcomes Using Two Different Suturing Techniques: A Randomized and Patient-Blinded Pilot Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4): 1410-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03339-6. Epub 2023 May 1. PMID: 37127811; PMCID: PMC10390350

27. Rodrigues C., Carvalho F., Marques M. Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Surgical Techniques and ResultsSystematic Review and Meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;47(5):1870-1883. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03436-6.

28. Hollander M.H.J, Delli K., Vissink A., Schepers R.H., Jansma J. Patient-reported aesthetic outcomes of upper blepharoplasty: a randomized controlled trial comparing two surgical techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep;51(9):1161-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.02.007.

29. Vasović D.D., Karamarković M.L., Jovanović M., Stojičić M., Rašić D.M., Marjanović I., Kalezić T., Jeremić M. Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Life following Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Prospective Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 19;60(3):500. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030500.


Review

For citations:


Manturova N.E., Sharobaro V.I., Le H., Nguyen T.S., Nguyen D.B., Anurov M.V., Nguyen H.N., Ustyugov A.Yu. Comparative analysis of pretarsal and sub-brow blepharoplasty for correction of age-related upper eyelid changes in Asian race patients. Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2025;28(1):59-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/92/07

Views: 151


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-1471 (Print)