Preview

Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery

Advanced search

pecial features of surgical approach for patients with Dupuytren's contracture (our experience)

https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/88/07

Abstract

Objective. Although many years history of study, the issue of treating patients with Dupuytren's contracture keeps on being relevant. It is due to high incidence of this pathological condition among the population (up to 8.2%), the lack of a unified surgical treatment approach, and a high risk of postoperative complications (up to 40%). Existing approaches to the treatment do not ensure the absence of condition recurrence and are related to a long recovery period (up to 12 months).

Purpose of the study: to improve the outcomes and reduce the treatment period of the patients with Dupuytren's contracture by creating and integrating algorithm for choosing the optimal surgical intervention in clinical practice.

Material and methods. The study involved two parts. In the first part data of surgical treatment performed for 8962 patients with Dupuytren's contracture (10213 surgeries) operated during the period of 2007–2022 were analyzed. 6632 male (74%) and 2330 female (26%) were enrolled in the study. The patients’ mean age was (57 ± 6) years old (from 24 to 92 years old). 9396 needle fasciotomies (92%), 562 subtotal fasciectomies (5.5%), and 255 inspection interventions for recurrence after subtotal fasciectomy (2.5%) were performed.

In the second part of the study, we suggested a universal algorithm for choosing the optimal technique of surgical treatment of patients with Dupuytren's contracture, depending on the severity, the presence of concomitant skin problems in the operation site (tightening scars or trophic lesions), the number of recurrences, and the method having caused them.

Results and discussion. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 15 years. Treatment outcomes were assessed using the qDASH scale and the treatment satisfaction subjective scale. Perfect treatment outcomes were obtained in 56.8% of cases, good – in 28.2%, satisfactory – in 11.1%, and unsatisfactory – in 3.9% of cases. Complications (iatrogenic damage to the dactylar nerves and arteries, flexor tendons, ruptures and deep skin cracks, and superficial infectious complications) occurred in less than 8% of patients. Contracture recurrences were noted in 5370 cases (52.6%).

The analysis of our own 15-year experience (more than 10000 surgeries) as well as the study of colleagues’ experience (according to the literature) allowed us to formulate the guidance for choosing the approach of treating the patients with various forms of Dupuytren's contracture.

In primary Dupuytren's contracture, we recommend needle fasciotomy (or collagenase injections) as a quick, minimally invasive surgical procedure causing minimal complications and contraindications (less than 8%). In severe cases, rehabilitation under the monitoring of a hand physician is recommended after the surgery.

If the recurrence takes place after needle fasciotomy, a repeated minimally invasive procedure may be conducted. The condition recurring three or more times, we recommend considering the open surgery – subtotal fasciectomy accompanying by obligatory epidermic grafting (not palmar skin): cross-finger flap, dorsal metacarpal artery bond flap (Quaba/Maruyama), or full-thickness free skin graft taken from the forearm.

The recurrence after subtotal fasciectomy occuring, the presence of tightening scars and trophic lesions should be assessed. In some cases, the tightening scars lack, a needle fasciotomy may be conducted by specialists having mastered the technique. In other cases, trophic lesions absent, we consider the inspection subtotal fasciectomy accompanied by the obligatory closure of the soft tissue defect using a full-thickness skin autograft or bond flap (not palmar skin) must be performed.

Obligatory patients’ follow-up for two years (medical examinations every six months) after the surgery to identify the early signs of recurrence, collagenase or steroids injections into the palmar aponeurosis nodes (and/or physiotherapy with Fermencol) in case of disease progression, or prophylactic radiotherapy immediately after the surgery virtually allow to eliminate the risk of the condition recurrence.

Conclusions. Analysis of the treatment outcomes of patients with Dupuytren's contracture of varying severity allowed us to work out a universal algorithm for choosing the optimal tactics of surgical treatment of the condition enabling improving the outcomes, reducing the recovery period, and decreasing the risk of recurrence.

About the Authors

А. V. Zhigalo
LLC “My Medical Center”
Russian Federation

Andrei V. Zhigalo, Cand. Med. sci., traumatologist-orthopedist, head of the Hand Surgery Center

8 A, Malaya Konyushennaya st., St. Petersburg, 191186



V. V. Pochtenko
LLC “My Medical Center”
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Pochtenko, traumatologist-orthopedist, Clinic of the Hand Surgery Center

8 A, Malaya Konyushennaya st., St. Petersburg, 191186



V. V. Morozov
LLC “My Medical Center”
Russian Federation

Viktor V. Morozov, traumatologist-orthopedist, Clinic of the Hand Surgery Center

8 A, Malaya Konyushennaya st., St. Petersburg, 191186



Р. А. Berezin
Arkhangelsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Pavel A. Berezin, traumatologist-orthopedist, the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics

292, Lomonosov st., Arkhangelsk, 163045



V. V. Baranov
City Clinical Hospital No. 34
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Baranov, traumatologist-orthopedist, head of the Hand Microsurgery Department



D. G. Nakonechny
LLC “My Medical Center”; I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden
Russian Federation

Dmitry G. Nakonechny, Cand. Med. sci., traumatologist-orthopedist, Clinic of the Hand Surgery Center;  traumatologist-orthopedist; Associate Professor, the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics

8 A, Malaya Konyushennaya st., St. Petersburg, 191186;

8, Academician Baykov st., St. Petersburg, 195427;

6-8, Lev Tolstoy st., St. Petersburg, 197022



М. R. Kalashnikova
I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

Maria R. Kalashnikova, traumatologist-orthopedist, post-graduate student, the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics



N. A. Karpinsky
LLC “My Medical Center”; Clinic of High Medical Technologies named after N.I. Pirogov St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Nikolai A. Karpinsky, traumatologist-orthopedist, Clinic of the Hand Surgery Center; raumatologist-orthopedist 

8 A, Malaya Konyushennaya st., St. Petersburg, 191186;

154, emb. Fontanka River, St. Petersburg, 190103



References

1. Salari N. et al. The worldwide prevalence of the Dupuytren disease: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct;15(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01999-7

2. Lanting R., Broekstra D.C., Werker P.M.N., van den Heuvel E.R. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of Dupuytren disease in the general population of Western countries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar;133(3):593-603. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000438455.37604.0f

3. Sasaki N., Uesato R., Yamauchi T, Ishibashi Y., Nakaji S. Epidemiology of Dupuytren's Disease in Japanese General Population. J Hand Surg Asian Pac. 2021 Jun;26(2):229-234. doi: 10.1142/S2424835521500235

4. Coulibaly N.F., Doumbia M.M., Dembele B, et al. Dupuytren's disease: A reality in Black Africa. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2020 Oct;39(5):448-453. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.04.005

5. de Alencar F.H.U. et al. Epidemiology of Dupuytren disease and Patients Undergoing Selective Fasciectomy. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug;56(4):478-484. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721839

6. Ball C., Izadi D., Verjee L.S., Chan J., Nanchahal J. Systematic review of non-surgical treatments for early Dupuytren's disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 15;17(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1200-y

7. Mella J.R., Guo L., Hung V. Dupuytren's Contracture: An Evidence Based Review. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Dec; 81(6S Suppl 1):S97-S101. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001607

8. Denkler K.A., Vaughn C.J., Dolan E.L., Hansen S.L. Evidence-Based Medicine: Options for Dupuytren's Contracture: Incise, Excise, and Dissolve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):240e-255e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002857

9. Hever P., Smith O.J., Nikkhah D. Dupuytren's Fasciectomy: Surgical Pearls in Planning and Dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jul 21;8(7):e2832. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002832

10. Ulishhenko A.A. Morfologija i operativnoe lechenie bolezni Dyupyuitrena: avtoref. dis kand. med. nauk [Morphology and surgical treatment of Dupuytren's disease: Author. Dis. Cand. Med. sci.]. Moscow, 2019;24 p. (in Russ.).

11. Denkler K.A., Park K.M., Alser O. Treatment Options for Dupuytren's Disease: Tips and Tricks. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jan 27;10(1):e4046. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004046.

12. Zhou C. et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy and Limited Fasciectomy for Dupuytren's Contracture: A Multicenter Observational Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):837-846. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002560

13. Warwick D., Nm Werker P., Pess G., Hirata H., Hunter-Smith D.J. Dupuytren's disease: using needles more across the world. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 Jan;47(1):80-88. doi: 10.1177/17531934211043307

14. Zhigalo A.V., Pochtenko V.V., Morozov V.V., Stadnichenko S.Yu. Maloinvazivnaya igol'naya aponevrotomiya v lechenii bol'nyh s kontrakturoy Dyupyuitrena] [Minimally invasive needle aponeurotomy in the treatment patients with Dupuytren's contracture]. Voprosy rekonstruktivnoy i plasticheskoy khirurgii – Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2017;17(3):33-44. (In Russ.).

15. Idrisov H.K., Rodomanova L.A., Ushakov M.D. Dvuhetapnaya metodika lecheniya pacientov s kontrakturoy Djupjuitrena III–IV stepeni [Dupuytren's contracture of III–IV degree: treatment by two-stage technique]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2022;3 [updated 2022 May 27; cited 2023 July 22] URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=31737 (In Russ.).

16. Bolt A.M., Giele H., McNab I.S.H., Spiteri M. Outcome of arthrodesis for severe recurrent proximal interphalangeal joint contractures in Dupuytren's disease. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021 May;46(4):403-405. doi: 10.1177/1753193420960309

17. Kan H.J., Hovius S.E. Long-term follow-up of flaps for extensive Dupuytren's and Ledderhose disease in one family. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012, 65: 1741-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.056

18. Hovius S.E.R. My 40-year perspective on hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 May;43(4):351-361. doi: 10.1177/1753193418765697

19. Torrekens M., Van Nuffel M., Couck I., De Smet L., Degreef I. Skin grafting prevents recurrence in Dupuytren's disease and extension correlates with fibrosis diathesis score. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Sep;40(4):495-499. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.03.008


Review

For citations:


Zhigalo А.V., Pochtenko V.V., Morozov V.V., Berezin Р.А., Baranov V.V., Nakonechny D.G., Kalashnikova М.R., Karpinsky N.A. pecial features of surgical approach for patients with Dupuytren's contracture (our experience). Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2024;27(1):70-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/88/07

Views: 622


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-1471 (Print)